Typical scenario

Small fragments compared with a broken display window

If transparent fragments in a jacket pocket are compared with a broken display window, appearance is insufficient. Several panes may be involved and pocket particles may have different origins. Separate them and obtain representative samples from each relevant pane.

What needs to be clarified

Compare particles and window glass using available features, assessing differences and limits on common-origin conclusions.

Materials to prepare

  • Separately packed jacket and particle recovery record
  • Separate samples from each damaged pane, mapped to the window
  • Damage photographs and replacement or cleanup history

What to compare

Describe and group particles while preserving recovery locations. Check physical fit when size permits, then optical features and, if needed, elemental composition. Consider within-pane variability, repeatability and discrimination criteria; do not automatically group all transparent fragments together.

Possible outcome of the analysis

A report may establish differences or describe agreeing features with qualifications, providing measurements, photographs and objects for which comparison was insufficient.

Limits of the conclusions

Matching properties do not uniquely identify the window. Timing, contact circumstances and secondary transfer need independent evidence.

Forensic examination of materials, substances and products
Write to usDiscuss your task ↗